Kenosha

 The events leading up to the shooting of Jacob Blake.

This information was released by the Kenosha Professional Police Association.

The officers were dispatched to the location due to a complaint that Mr. Blake was attempting to steal the caller's keys/vehicle.

Officers were aware of Mr. Blake's open warrant for felony sexual assault (3rd degree) before they arrived on scene. 

Mr. Blake was not breaking up a fight between two females when officers arrived on scene. 

The silver SUV seen in the widely circulated video was not Mr. Blake's vehicle.

Mr. Blake was not unarmed. He was armed with a knife. The officers did not see the knife initially. The officers first saw him holding the knife while they were on the passenger side of the vehicle. The "main" video circulating on the internet shows Mr. Blake with the knife in his left hand when he rounds the front of the car. The officers issued repeated commands for Mr. Blake to drop the knife. He did not comply. 

The officers initially tried to speak with Mr. Blake, but he was uncooperative. 

The officers then began issuing verbal commands to Mr. Blake, but he was non-complaint. 

The officers next went "hands-on" with Mr. Blake, so as to gain compliance and control. 

Mr. Blake actively resisted the officers' attempt to gain compliance. 

The officers then disengaged and drew their tasers, issuing commands to Mr. Blake that he would be tased if he did not comply. 

Based on his non-compliance, one officer tased Mr. Blake. The taser did not incapacitate Mr. Blake. 

The officers once more went "hands-on" with Mr. Blake; again, trying to gain control of the escalating situation. 

Mr. Blake forcefully fought with the officers, including putting one of the officers in a headlock. 

A second taser (from a different officer than had deployed the initial taser) was then deployed on Mr. Blake. It did not appear to have any impact on him. 

Based on the inability to gain compliance and control after using verbal, physical and less-lethal means, the officers drew their firearms. 

Mr. Blake continued to ignore the officers' commands, even with the threat of lethal force now present. 

Two points to make here.

It is stunning how quickly the narrative can turn on its ear whenever there is a possible racial component. George Floyd, Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Freddy Grey. All of these incidents have led to various levels protesting, rioting, and looting. And all before the facts of each individual case has been explored and examined. The saddest part of this, is even after facts of each case become more public, it does not alter the course of events in the slightest.

At what point in time do people accept the responsibility for their own actions? At what point in time does the interested public demand that folks comply with the demands of police officers. What on God's green earth makes people think "all I have to do is fight these guys and it'll all go away."? In nearly every single case of an "unarmed" black male, or white male for that matter, losing their life, it comes down to non-compliance. That police officers are systematically hunting down black males to shoot them is a false narrative. During all of the aftermath of an encounter, I don't believe I've heard one time somebody mentioned he should have complied. If someone does mention compliance, it is a voice in the wilderness, not heard, ignored, or dismissed completely.