Monday, August 20, 2012
A Response
Patrice over at Rural Revolution has put together a great World Net Daily column about why young people should seriously consider getting a vocational education rather than going into debt for a college degree. Her points are very valid and I happen to fully agree with her. College isn’t for everyone and there are plenty of jobs out there that don’t require a college education and they pay well enough to support a family.
But there are some folks who don’t agree. In fact, there was a comment from “twosidedtruth” that caught my eye. I was going to respond to his/her comment but it got rather lengthy and decided to make it a blog post (The first in over a month).
2-Sided, three points that I'd like you to consider. First, if you look back at the history of the Great Depression you should note that when FDR put in place those high tax brackets on the rich an economy that was showing signs of recovery hit the skids once again. In 1937 the top rate was raised to 79% and the economy plunged as investments dried up in 1938. It took a war to bring about a recovery (although that was artificial as proven by the severe dip after the war).
Labels:
College,
Education,
European Union,
Mitt Romney,
taxes,
Trucking,
Unemployment
Monday, July 16, 2012
Seattle Paper "Digs" Romney
Interesting
story from the Seattle PI. The Seattle PI is the more liberal of the two
major newspapers in the Seattle area, the other being the Seattle Times which
could be considered more middle of the road. Worth noting is that the Seattle
PI ceased publishing an actual newspaper, with only an online version, a few
years ago while the Times continues with both print and lonline versions.
In
the story linked above, it seems that a Super-PAC is trying to smear one of the
democrats running for Congress. In an interesting twist, the Super-PAC supports
the rival democrat candidate.
The
most interesting aspect of the story (IMO) is the dig at Mitt Romney, who has
no dog in this fight what-so-ever. As a liberal rag, the PI just could resist
putting in this little bit.
The slick mailings have made largely
untrue claims about DelBene’s business record. She is a former vice president
at Microsoft who resigned as state revenue director to make her second bid for
Congress. The latest tries to make DelBene look like Mitt Romney.
(Emphasis mine, says PACNW Righty)
Very
curious that the PI doesn’t even bother to say mention that the charges leveled
against Romney by the Obama administration regarding Romney, Bain Capital, and
the Salt Lake City Olympics have proven to be false.
Maybe
they were trying to say DelBene looks and acts presidential? But then again,
maybe not?
Monday, June 25, 2012
Obama Tells SCOTUS - Screw You
Well, not actually those words.
This administration gets more and more lawless at every turn.
This administration gets more and more lawless at every turn.
I
won’t even begin to recap all of the steps outside the Constitution Obama and
those who work for him have taken during the 3.5 years he has been in office.
Rather, I will point
you here for a decent rundown.
Now we have them basically telling the
SCOTUS to take a long walk off a short pier.
Today, the SCOTUS
ruled that a good chunk of Arizona’s Illegal Immigrant law (which mirrors
the Federal law) was unconstitutional. Won’t rehash the details here, but it
basically boiled down to the states stepping on federal toes. However, they did
allow the teeth of the law to stay put. That will allow Arizona law enforcement
officers (LEOs) to question, and check, the immigration status of folks they
come in contact with during contact (speeder pulled over can have their
immigration status checked).
So what does the Obama Administration
do? Within hours of the SCOTUS releasing their decision on the Arizona law
Department of Homeland Security tell their enforcement agencies not to
cooperate with Arizona LEOs on matters pertaining to immigration status checks.
This will make the efforts of local agencies to conduct immigration checks
nearly impossible since the databases of that kind of information is under
federal jurisdiction.
According to the
Department of Homeland Security, DHS officials in Arizona have been directed no
to respond to the scene of a state or local stop or a similar law enforcement
encounter upon the requests from state and local police officers for assistance
in enforcing immigration laws unless the individual meets DHS enforcement
priorities – is a convicted criminal, has been removed from the US previously
and reentered unlawfully or is a recent border crosser. (Source: KPHO)
Beyond unbelievable. This group has
decided that as long as they are in office, they will use any means necessary
to achieve their unconstitutional goals. They continue to further divide this
nation with each and every unconstitutional act.
I will be real curious to see what the
response will be if the SCOTUS declares Obama unconstitutional. Will Obama use
another Executive Order to make an attempt to overrule the SCOTUS decision?
I also wonder if Obama and his crew see
the writing on the wall as to how much longer they have in office. Are they
making these moves, knowing full well their time is short and they want to do
as much damage as they possibly can before it all over in Jan 2013? What more is in store before the year is up?
Matthews Is An Idiot
I can’t understand how anyone who is supposed to be smart enough to be on TV to commentate on events can really be this stupid.
But
the more I think about it the more the realization burns through that it really
isn’t stupidity on his part that makes him say things like this. It is the
people his is talking to. Matthews can say things like this knowing full well
that no one in his audience will bother to check the truth of the charges he is
making. Actually, he is playing it smart.
Does he bother to mention that the framers of the Constitution put mechanisms in place to get rid of slavery? While he does mention the 13 Amendment, he discusses it like it was done to overcome the mistakes of the Founding Fathers, rather than using the amendment process, which founders put in the Constitution for just such a situation.
Of course, there is no way he would mention that it was the democrats who tried to filibuster the Civil Rights Amendments. Nor would he bother to mention that Republicans were to ones to lead the charge to get the Amendments passed in the first place. And would he mention that it was a Republican President who wrote the Emancipation Proclamation that actually freed the slaves. And lest we forget, it was democrats who wrote nearly all of the Jim Crow laws that essentially put blacks back on the plantations.
But Matthews can say all of these things because he knows that the VERY few people who watch him will not bother to check his statements. They will blindly believe whatever he says and take it as gospel that it was Republicans/Conservatives who are/were the racists.
Labels:
Chris Matthews,
Civil Rights,
Racism,
Supreme Court
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Liberal Rag Posts Allen West’s Home Address,Picture
Liberal Rag Posts Allen West’s Home Address,Picture
This kind of thing really bothers me a lot. Why would someone post the address of a Congressman other than to put that person's life in danger. I do like the point made at the link. Did the jacka$$ consider that he might very well be putting Rep West's family in danger?
This kind of thing really bothers me a lot. Why would someone post the address of a Congressman other than to put that person's life in danger. I do like the point made at the link. Did the jacka$$ consider that he might very well be putting Rep West's family in danger?
Does Mr. Obama Disrespect the US Flag?
Of
course this was NOT reported in the lame stream media but it appears that our
First, ahem, Lady, Michelle Obama completely and utterly disrespect the US
Flag.
I think what bothers me even more was the response from her husband. He smiles grimly and nods. Almost as if he is agreeing with her stance on the matter.
Lip
readers have said that it appears that she is saying “All of this for a flag.”
I think what bothers me even more was the response from her husband. He smiles grimly and nods. Almost as if he is agreeing with her stance on the matter.
From
the “For the first time I am proud to be an American”, to the “clinging to
their guns and religion” comments and his initial refusal to wear the US flag
lapel pin and his startling lack of ability to connect with US Troops we keep
getting reminds of just how far off the main stream this guy really is.
Why
the upcoming election is even close right now is beyond me. I do understand why
there is a segment of our country that will vote for this guy no matter what he
does. But for all you middle of the roaders out there who just want to live
your lives, standing on your own two feet, it completely baffles me why you’d
even consider voting for this guy once more.
Someone Is Really Upset
Very
good “Afterburner” from Bill Whittle.
Follow
the Ideology basically makes a very compelling case why President Obama and US Attorney
General Holder developed and/or allowed Operation Fast and Furious to happen.
There is no question the dude is pissed.
Labels:
Constitution,
Eric Holder,
Fast and Furious,
Guns,
Obama
Saturday, June 16, 2012
Women are Women (And I Love It)
I
know that most of my readers are fans of Patrice over at Rural Revolution. In
fact, most of you probably came from there when Patrice was kind enough to
provide me with some linkage.
If
you are a fan of hers, then you certainly read her
article on WND regarding equal pay. I would like to add a few observations
from my point of view on this subject matter.
I
really think she hits the spot and the evidence she provides is empirical fact.
I know that when I have held discussions on this subject matter with my
left-wing mother, these facts tend to bring the topic to a close because she
can’t refute them. Facts are stubborn things.
But
I would also like to add my own thoughts based on many years of experience. As
you are aware, I spent a long time in the service of this great nation (it was
an honor). And my observations are based on this time. I would also like to add
these thoughts are my own, and in no way official military policy or stance.
Not that military officials would touch this with a ten foot pole, but I felt I
needed to add this to keep my butt out of sling (even though I am now retired).
Friday, June 1, 2012
Walesa Persona-non-Grata
This
is rather stunning.
A
guy who could be considered the father of modern day Poland is considered to
political to be a visitor to the Obama White House.
Way
back in the bad old days of the Soviet Union and the Iron Curtain there was an
electrician who led many, many protest against Soviet occupation and the
corrupt Communist Polish government. For his efforts he was arrested many times.
He led a movement, Solidarity, that could be given as much credit for the end
of the Soviet Union as President Reagan’s policies. He was a labor union
leader.
Leah
Walesa was deemed to political to be seen in the White House.
Polish
leadership had requested Walesa accept Medal of Freedom on behalf of Jan
Karski. But they were rejected. Too political.
So,
still think Obama is a great foreign policy president? In a matter of a few
days Obama and his staff utterly piss off an entire nation of 38 million. First
to break was the snafu of calling the Nazi concentration camps “Polish death
camps”. I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on that. I mean, let’s
face it, Obama is only as good of a speaker as his speech writers are. If he
speech writers are not willing to do a tad bit of research, we can’t expect
Obama to do any better. Jeez, that is what staffs are for. As a leader (and I
am not calling Obama a leader), you expect your staff to make you look good.
You hire people you expect will cover your backside. But this was a mistake of
his staff, not of Obama’s.
But
to turn down Lech Walesa, a union leader for goodness sake, is just plain bad
form. But I guess they had to weigh his union activities with the fact that
Walesa helped bring down the Soviet Union, a form of government many in the
Obama administration undoubtedly admire.
Unemployment Ticks Up
The
May unemployment numbers are in and they are not good. Only 69,000 jobs were
created which was well off the “expected” 125,000+ thought. And the
unemployment rate rose started to move upwards once again to 8.2%.
All
in all, not good news for President Obama with an election only a few short
months away. So far, Obama has presided over a very weak economic recovery,
probably one of the weakest recoveries ever. Even during the dark days of the
Great Depression, once we started to come out of it in 1935-1936, recovery numbers
were much better than this. Of course, with unemployment near 30% any upward
movement was good.
The
question now becomes whether Romney can articulate his vision into something
the voters will relate to. Can he convince voters that he is the answer to the
problems in the economy? Most of you know that I am not a Romney fan, but I am
firmly planted in the “anyone but Obama” camp. I am concerned of his flip-flops
on several issues such as the 2nd Amendment and his “evolving” stance on
abortion. But I cannot question his experience when it comes to what matters
most to folks right now and that is his business acumen.
I
really don’t think Obama has a clue how to recover this economy. His socialist
views on the world and how to make things work doesn’t really work well in
getting a stagnant economy running once again. He has tried clean energy and
that has failed terribly. Almost a trillion dollars thrown into the pit of
Solyndra and other companies with nothing but bankruptcy and job losses to show
for it. Locking away mineral resources that could provide jobs by the hundreds
of thousands and reduce our reliance on terrorist-sponsoring governments. Energy
prices that are expected to skyrocket over the next few years as the EPA puts crippling
regulations into force. And don’t forget
Obama Care. Not exactly the recipe for job and economic growth.
But
Obama sure does look good and speaks well (as long as the teleprompter is
working) and isn’t that all that matters?
If
I have any liberal readers out there, could you please provide any form of
rebuttal. Please give us examples of what “The Chosen Once” has done that has
been good for the economy. But before you go down the stimulus road as your
example, please remember that nearly all of that money was wasted paying off
favored donors and pet projects. The sex habits of grizzly bears and the
aforementioned Solyndra fiasco isn’t exactly what an economic recovery is made
of. And he himself has said that projects weren’t exactly “shovel ready.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)